From the NY Times {before & after photos here}:
Sarah Palin’s wardrobe joined the ranks of symbolic political excess on Wednesday, alongside John McCain’s multiple houses and John Edwards’s
$400 haircut, as Republicans expressed fear that weeks of tailoring Ms.
Palin as an average “hockey mom” would fray amid revelations that the Republican Party outfitted her with expensive clothing from high-end stores ...
Such an image is unhelpful at this late stage of the general election, Republicans said, especially when many families are experiencing economic pain, and when the image applies to a candidate,
like Ms. Palin, who has run for office in part on her appeal as an
outdoors enthusiast and former small-town mayor who scorns pretensions.
“It
looks like nobody with a political antenna was working on this,” said
Ed Rollins, a Republican political consultant who ran President Ronald Reagan’s re-election campaign in 1984. “It just undercuts Palin’s whole image as a hockey mom, a ‘one-of-us’ kind of candidate” ...
Republican officials said all the clothes would be given to charity
after the campaign is over. If Ms. Palin kept the clothes, the $150,000
would have to be taxed as income, tax experts said.
Had the
purchases been made by the McCain campaign, it would be a conversion of
campaign money into personal use, which is prohibited. The same rule
does not apply to money from party committees.
“The R.N.C.
cleverly used the party committee’s money to avoid the liability that
would have occurred if campaigns funds were used,” said Kenneth Gross,
a lawyer who is an expert in campaign finance.
I think Ed Rollins was on to something as the chance to go after hypocrisy is just so alluring:
Recent Comments